Obama's Job Summit was Immigration Lite and Heavy on the B.S.

Obama's Job Summit was Immigration Lite and Heavy on the B.S.


Date: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 3:31 PM


<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER No. 2056 -- 12/09/2009 >>>>>

blog version:
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/12/09/obamas-job-summit-was-immigration-lite-and-heavy-on-the-bs/

Pat Buchanan makes a very good point concerning President Obama s job summit
by asking the question "Why Import Workers Now?":
http://buchanan.org/blog/why-import-workers-now-3186

At last week s Job Summit, there was talk of a second stimulus
package, of tax credits for small businesses that hire new
workers, of an Infrastructure Bank to select national priority
pubic works projects like the Hoover Dam and TVA of yesteryear.

But no one, it seems, advanced the one obvious idea that would
have the most immediate and dramatic impact -- a moratorium on
all immigration into the United States.

Obama and the participants in the Jobs Summit managed to avoid the immigration
issue, which is quite an accomplishment considering it s such an important
factor in unemployment. There was one question about immigration during
Obama s forum at the end of the summit:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-and-qa-closing-session-forum-jobs-and-economic-growth
Whitehouse Transcript

Q Mr. President, thank you for the invitation. My name is Bill
Aossey from Cedar Rapids, Iowa. I have a request that won t cost
us anything. It ll bring money home. Can you please help ease
the visa regulations so we can have students coming back, and
international business visitors that will bring money and cultivate
long-term resources of culture and academic relationships? So
please help ease this visa -- it ll bring money in and it won t
cost us anything. Thank you.

Aossey didn t consider the real cost of handing out student visas: jobs and
national security. Of course neither did Obama, who agreed that letting in
more foreign students is a freebie:

If those students start seeing a closed door, then we are losing
what is one of our greatest competitive advantages, and that s
something that I think we re committed to doing.

Let me broaden the point. There are a lot of things that don t
cost money that could make a difference.

It s worth watching the video on CSPAN at the 40 minute mark.

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/290419-2
White House Jobs Summit Closing, Dec. 3

When I watched it live on CSPAN the thing that struck me as very strange was
that Aossey was identified as president of Midamar Food Services. Why, I asked
myself, would somebody in the food service industry be so interested in
student visas?

The Midamar website reveals some powerful clues as background on Bill Aossey s
grandfather is provided:

http://www.midamar.com/scripts/companyinfo_history.asp

In 1907, Yahya Aossey, a young boy of about 16 years old, left the
Lebanon Region of Syria to immigrate to the "Promised Land" of
America and to the heartland of the U.S.A.

The ethnic identity of Midamar s clientele is also revealed. According to the
same website:

Further, MIDAMAR S continued goal is to satisfy the Western and
Ethnic Halal food requests by Muslim consumers wanting to be
part of Western society, yet still remain faithful to the
teachings of Islam with regard to what is Halal and Haram.

Perhaps it s a coincidence, but Moslems are big users of student visas.
It s one of the favored methods for radical Middle Eastern Moslems to
immigrate to the U.S. That s how many of the 9/11 terrorists came here.

Obama s response was disturbing:

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think you make an important suggestion. We
live in a interconnected world and an interdependent world, and I
think that, properly, we had to respond to 9/11 by reviewing our
policies on visas, on immigration, on a whole host of issues.

Perhaps another coincidence, but Obama s reply sure seemed to indicate that he
knew all about Bill Aossey s ethnic and religious identity, and Obama
connected Aossey with the desire to allow more "students" to come from Islamic
countries. Obama almost seemed to be apologetic towards Aossey that student
visas were restricted after 9/11. Fortunately Obama never gave Aossey more
than empty rhetoric as far as increasing the availability of visas, but he
spent quite a bit of time opining that there is no reason for the U.S. to
indulge in protectionism.

But I think it is important for us not to get into a bunker
mentality. That s not America s strength. Our strength has
always been saying yes to the rest of the world, inviting
ideas and different cultures and commerce. And we have not
seen the same kinds of openness, I think, over the last
several years that I d like to see.

Now, we ve got to do it in a prudent way, but, you know, let s just
take the example of foreign students. One of the great things about
this country is we get the best and the brightest talent to study
here, and once they study here they start enjoying the intellectual
freedom and the entrepreneurship, and they decide to stay, and they
start new businesses. And suddenly you ve got a whole new
generation of folks who are creating intel or other extraordinary
businesses.

Obama pushed the education button and used it as an opportunity to take a jab
at working Americans:

But I told the story of my lunch with the President -- President
Lee of South Korea. And, Gary, you were in that lunch --
remember I asked him, what s happening in terms of education
policy in Korea? And he said, well, you know, my biggest problem
is, Korean parents are too demanding and they are insisting,
for example, that I import, and I ve had to import, thousands of
foreign English teachers because they all feel that first graders
should be learning English already.

Did Obama just imply that American parents are slackers while Korean parents
are "too demanding"? It appears that Obama was sold a phony bill of goods when
he talked to President Lee. While it s true that Korea hires many English
teachers the number is nowhere near "thousands" -- it s more like "lots".

http://www.eslcafe.com/jobs/korea/index.cgi?read=40066
Lots of teaching positions are available all around Korea

In order to teach in Korea, Americans can get an E-2 visa. In case you think
you want to take the next plane to Korea for one of the "thousands"
of lucrative jobs, read this disclaimer from the U.S. State Department.
First thing to pay attention to is that unlike the U.S., they take immigration
law seriously so don t try to pull a fast one!

http://travel.state.gov/travel/living/teaching/teaching_1240.html
TEACHING ENGLISH IN KOREA, OPPORTUNITIES AND PITFALLS

LEGAL WARNING! Some Americans have run into serious legal problems
with Korean Immigration because they either work as English
teachers while in Korea on tourist visas or they accept part-time
employment or private classes without obtaining the proper
permission. Violation of Korean immigration laws can result in
severe penalties including imprisonment, fines of up to 100,000
won ($120) for each day of overstay, or deportation with a ban
on re-entry for up to two years. It is your responsibility to
understand local laws and to obey them.

Now, here is the really bad news!

Unfortunately some American citizens come to Korea under contract,
with promises of generous salaries, bonuses and other amenities,
only to find themselves in tenuous situations, often lacking funds
to return to the U.S.

Of course our government tends to be overly optimistic. For a far more
realistic assessment of these jobs be sure to read this from Charles Moffat,
somebody that s been there, done that:

http://www.lilith-ezine.com/articles/politics/Dont-Teach-in-South-Korea.html

"Don t Teach English in South Korea."

If you re thinking of going overseas to teach English in South
Korea, my first advice to you is DON T.

Don t go! Pick a different country or find a job somewhere else.

I estimate there is a 70% chance that if you go you will end up
getting screwed over in your contract and actually end up losing
money. Most people don t last the first three months with a
company. The ones who stay longer usually end up getting screwed
over for even more money.

Now you know why Korea needs so many English teachers. It s because their
education is sooooooooo superior!

Obama didn t stop blabbering about the mentality of those hard working Asians
-- he included China.

Now, you think about that mentality, which is pervasive throughout
Asia -- you saw the same thing in China -- and it gives you a
sense of what we re up against in terms of global competition.

So as tough as this recession is, as tough as the job market may be,
we need to double down on our education investment.

Let s be blunt about what Obama really said: he pushed the education button of
course, but more importantly he implied that the problem with our economy is
that foreigners such as Koreans are just plain willing to work harder. And
doggone it, American parents just let their kids goof off too much!


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://buchanan.org/blog/why-import-workers-now-3186

December 8th, 2009
Why Import Workers Now?

By Patrick J. Buchanan

At last week s Job Summit, there was talk of a second stimulus package, of tax
credits for small businesses that hire new workers, of an Infrastructure Bank
to select national priority public works projects like the Hoover Dam and TVA
of yesteryear.

But no one, it seems, advanced the one obvious idea that would have the most
immediate and dramatic impact -- a moratorium on all immigration into the
United States.

Unemployment is at 10 percent, near the postwar high of 1983. Fifteen million
Americans are out of work. Ten million more have given up looking or are
working fewer hours than they would like.

We have been losing jobs every month for two years.

Why, then, are we still bringing immigrants into the United States at a rate
of 125,000 a month to take jobs from fellow Americans and compete with our
unemployed for the jobs that open up?

In the last year, 1.5 million new immigrants have come to take up residence
and been issued work permits. Probably twice as many jobs have been taken by
these folks as the 650,000 the Obamaites claim were saved or created by their
$787 billion stimulus package. How do Democrats justify this?

How can they justify bringing in another 1.5 immigrants in 2010 and another
1.5 million in 2011, when 25 million Americans they are supposed to represent
are unemployed or underemployed?

If Obama voters feel disillusioned do they not have valid reason?

As for illegal aliens, it is estimated that 8 million still hold jobs in the
United States. Endlessly we are told that these hardworking folks are just
doing jobs that Americans refuse to do.

But Middle American News has taken a look at the Census Bureau data. In almost
all the occupations to which unskilled and semi-skilled illegal aliens
gravitate, native-born Americans hold most of the jobs.

U.S. citizens account for well over half of all housekeepers, maids, taxi
drivers and chauffeurs in the U.S., almost two-thirds of all the butchers,
meat processors and ground maintenance and construction workers, and three-
fourths of all porters, bellhops and janitors.

We are told that many if not most of these are "dead-end jobs" Americans do
not want or will not take. Yet, how can that be true when American citizens
are already doing most of these jobs?

As related here in October, USA Today found that, invariably, when U.S.
authorities raid a plant site where hundreds of illegals are working, and send
them packing, hundreds of Americans show up and apply for the jobs. Is this
not as it should be, if we are looking out for our own people first?
And isn t that what a family does, or should do?

Why, then, is the Obama administration cutting back on jobsite raids and
inspections? Why is the administration talking of moving in 2010 to legalize
the status of the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the United
States?

Is putting illegal aliens on the path to citizenship a higher priority for
this Obama crowd than opening up jobs for American workers?

Are the K Street lobbyists whose corporate bosses cannot get enough low-wage
labor that powerful? Are the Hispanic lobbies like La Raza and MALDEF, with
their charges of "nativist" and "xenophobe," so intimidating the Democratic
Party cannot stand up to them?

Two weeks ago, The Washington Post, focusing on unemployment among young
African-American males, wrote, "Joblessness for 16- to 24-year-old black men
has reached Great Depression proportions -- 34.5 percent in October, more than
three times the rate for the general U.S. population."

More than one-third of all young black males are unemployed.

Which raises a question. Where is the Black Caucus?

Here are folks who favor preferential treatment for their black constituents
over white Americans -- i.e., affirmative action. But they go mute when it
comes to immigrants coming and taking jobs and illegal aliens holding down 8
million of those jobs that could be going to the unemployed in their own
community.

Nor is it only working-class Americans who are being shouldered aside by the
annual flood tide of immigrants.

As Jerry Woodruff, editor of Middle American News, writes: "Immigrants are
taking good, high-paying jobs from highly skilled Americans. The Census Bureau
found that 34 percent of all software engineers -- are immigrants.
Yet, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers reports that 48,000
U.S. software engineers are unemployed."

If Obama wants to take executive action to assist Americans out looking for
work, he could take two strong and effective steps.

First, call on Congress to vote a moratorium on immigration until the
unemployment rate falls below 6 percent. Second, instruct Homeland Security
and the Justice Department to renew the raids and enforce the law against
employers who are taking jobs from Americans by illegally hiring undocumented
aliens.

If Obama did that, suddenly folks would sit up and say, as they did after
Ronald Reagan busted the air controllers, "This man is serious."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm

Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm

To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this email with UNSUbSCRIBE in
the subject window









Back to archives